Book Review: Red Ink
Click to Print This Page
Wessel, economics editor of The Wall Street Journal and bestselling author of In Fed We Trust, is undoubtedly qualified to give an in-depth look into the budget crisis. Because of the public's often misinformed view of the federal budget, his new book Red Ink: Inside the High-Stakes Politics of the Federal Budget is a necessity. Its easily readable form will keep the reader's attention on the main points.
Wessel begins with some graphic and disturbing statements that bring the reader right into the reality of today's unsustainable budget, including: "Nearly two-thirds of annual federal spending is on autopilot and doesn't require an annual vote by Congress," "the US defense budget is greater than the combined defense budgets of the next seventeen largest spenders," "Firing every federal government employee wouldn't save enough to even cut the deficit in half." The biggest hurdle is government spending on healthcare, which is projected to go from 25% to 35% of all spending in 2021. While many see the cost of the Iran and Afghanistan wars as the major cost problem, Wessel points out the Medicare drug benefit will cost more in time.
Federal income taxes are at the center of much politcal controversy on the budget deficit. But as Red Ink points out, 46% of US households pay no federal income tax, and "The share of income most American families pay in federal taxes has been falling for more than 30 years...We are now in 'The Age of Entitlements.'" This does not encourage public willingness to solve the budget deficit with either higher taxes or lower spending, which would be the rational approach and solution.
A huge hidden part of federal spending is tax breaks. These amounted to $1.1 trillion in 2011. The magnitude of this is that "The federal government gives up almost as much money from tax loopholes, deductions, credits and other tax breaks as it collects in individual and corporate income tax." As Erskine Bowles sums it up, "It's just spending by another name. It's somebody's social policy." His deficit reduction committee recommended ending these lopholes, tax breaks, etc., to reduce the deficit and lower taxes. The proposal was rejected.
The adopted deficit financing solution has been borrowing. "For every dollar the US goverment spent in 2011, it borrowed 36%, much of it from the Chinese." The dependence on Chinese buying US government bonds has been a concern for a long time, but not enough to prompt a sense of urgent political action. Instead, kicking the can down the road has been the long-time preferred response. Fortunately US government debt is viewed as a safe haven in troubled times. The credit risk yield of this debt remains an academic exercise— until some point in the future.
Financial professionals should have a realistic view of the core of our capital markets—the US Federal Budget, and our government debt. Red Ink should be on everyone's must-read list.